Arms And The Man, Watford Palace Theatre – Review
Pros: Some very funny performances
Cons: Occasional lulls in energy
summary
Rating
Good
A solid production of a Bernard Shaw classic
After Shakespeare, Bernard Shaw (the erstwhile George is discouraged these days) is one of the most frequently produced playwrights in the theatrical canon, and Arms and the Man is a fine example of why his appeal is so enduring. The combination of high intelligence, wit and social awareness can be intoxicating for an audience, and the boldness of his characters is endlessly attractive to actors. In the right hands, Shawās work can be both hilarious and thought-provoking, and this production, efficiently directed by Brigid Larmour, frequently satisfies.
Originally produced in 1894, Arms and the Man is set in 1885 during the war for Bulgarian independence. Fortunately, you donāt need to know the historical background to the play ā weāre told at the very beginning that Rainaās fiancĆ© Sergius is a military hero, and itās immediately obvious that the soldier who stumbles into her bedroom is neither Sergius nor even on the same side of the conflict. The intruder is Captain Bluntschli, a professional Swiss soldier fighting for the Serbs, and the first thing he does is to pull his pistol on Raina.
From this dramatic premise, Shaw fashions a play which is predominantly what weād now call romantic comedy. Initially terrified, Raina gradually softens towards the Captain, who is plain-spoken, honest, charming and handsome. As played by Pete Ashmore, the Captain is this productionās ace in the pack. Ashmore is absolutely in command of the stage and electrifies every moment heās on it. He flits effortlessly from convincingly sincere to hysterically funny, and is one of those actors you could happily watch all day. As Raina, Hannah Morrish provides an effective foil, showcasing some excellent comic timing.
Raina and her mother Catherine (Kathryn OāReilly, a commanding presence if not the subtlest performance of the evening) conceal the Captain and help him escape undetected. This sets up the action of the more farcical second half of the play, in which Sergius and Rainaās father Major Petkoff return victorious from the war, and the truth about the Captain emerges. As we discover Sergius isnāt quite the hero heās been painted, will Raina still want to marry him? Well, itās a romcom ā what do you think?
Sometimes with Shaw you need to work to mine the comedy, to find the funny in the merely witty. This production manages that whenever Ashmoreās Captain is onstage, and Walter van Dyk delivers a masterful performance as the Major, who becomes increasingly befuddled by events. Assad Zaman makes a charismatic Sergius but isnāt quite as successful at working his comic moments, and the scenes in which the secondary servant characters discuss class stunt the playās momentum. Itās true that these passages can lend themselves to serious interpretation, but a more humorous approach would have lifted them to match the rest of the production.
The Watford Palace Theatre is a comfortable regional venue and Rebecca Browerās designs, while not as fulsome as they might have been, decorate the impressive stage prettily enough. This is a perfectly respectable revival of the play, but its chief asset is undoubtedly Ashmoreās brilliantly accomplished performance. On his final exit, an overwhelmed Sergius can only exclaim āWhat a man!ā, and the audience enthusiastically agreed.
Author: Bernard Shaw
Director: Brigid Larmour
Producer: Watford Palace Theatre
Box Office: 01923 225671
Booking link: http://watfordpalacetheatre.co.uk/whats-on/theatre/arms-and-the-man/#tickets
Booking until: 22 October 2016




